Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 406 vs McCormick Intl C60L
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl C60L
Utility
- power
- 57.6 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
BelarusBelarus 406
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl C60L
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 406 higher · +0.4 hp (<1%)40658 hp
C60L57.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
406 is in the 52nd percentile; C60L is in the 51st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 406 higher · +52 ci (+26%)406253 ci
C60L201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
406 is in the 71st percentile; C60L is in the 54th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 406 higher · +1 (+33%)4064
C60L3
Median Utility Tractor4
406 is in the 50th percentile; C60L is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ C60L higher · +1 (+9%)40611
C60L12
Median Utility Tractor12
406 is in the 41st percentile; C60L is in the 50th · 4,941 models
406 (A)C60L (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 406 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 406 | C60L | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 406 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Perkins | — |
| Model | D144 (Belarus) | 1103C-33 | — |
| Power Output | 58hp | 57.6hp | ▲ 406+0.4 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ C60L+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 406+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 253ci | 201ci | ▲ 406+52 ci · +26% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5in | ▲ C60L+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 406 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 406 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 155in | 153in | ▲ 406+2 in · +1% |
| Width | Not recorded | 67in | — |
| Height | 106in | 94.9in | ▲ 406+11.1 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 7,056lb | 5,190lb | ▲ 406+1,866 lb · +36% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 406 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 406 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 406 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 406 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 52nd percentile (58 hp)B · 51st percentile (57.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 71st percentile (253 ci)B · 54th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 41st percentile (11)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 68th percentile (7,056 lb)B · 49th percentile (5,190 lb)
A · 406B · C60LMedian Utility Tractor