Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 500 vs CaseIH CX60
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH CX60
Sub-Compact
- power
- 64 hp
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
BelarusBelarus 500
vs
CaseIHCaseIH CX60
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 500 higher · +1 hp (+2%)50065 hp
CX6064 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
500 is in the 59th percentile; CX60 is in the 57th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 500 higher · +125 ci (+76%)500290 ci
CX60165 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
500 is in the 83rd percentile; CX60 is in the 44th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 500 higher · +1 (+33%)5004
CX603
Median Utility Tractor4
500 is in the 50th percentile; CX60 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 500 higher · +1 (+13%)5009
CX608
Median Utility Tractor12
500 is in the 35th percentile; CX60 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
500 (A)CX60 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH CX60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 500 | CX60 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH CX60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 903.27T | — |
| Power Output | 65hp | 64hp | ▲ 500+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ CX60+450 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 500+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 290ci | 165ci | ▲ 500+125 ci · +76% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.7in | ▲ 500+0.6 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 5in | ▲ CX60+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH CX60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Synchro Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH CX60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 84.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,100lb | 7,286lb | ▲ CX60+1,186 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH CX60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH CX60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH CX60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH CX60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH CX60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.4gal | 3.1gal | ▲ 500+2.3 gal · +74% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 59th percentile (65 hp)B · 57th percentile (64 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (290 ci)B · 44th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 58th percentile (6,100 lb)B · 69th percentile (7,286 lb)
A · 500B · CX60Median Utility Tractor