Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 5011
Utility
- power
- 60 hp
- displacement
- 289 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 11
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 5011 vs Challenger 65C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
BelarusBelarus 5011
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +225 hp (+375%)501160 hp
65C285 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5011 is in the 54th percentile; 65C is in the 96th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +349 ci (+121%)5011289 ci
65C638 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5011 is in the 83rd percentile; 65C is in the 95th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)50114
65C6
Median Utility Tractor4
5011 is in the 50th percentile; 65C is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5011 higher · +1 (+10%)501111
65C10
Median Utility Tractor12
5011 is in the 41st percentile; 65C is in the 39th · 4,941 models
5011 (A)65C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 5011 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Challenger | — |
| Model | 5011 | 65C | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 5011 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 60hp | 285hp | ▲ 65C+225 hp · +375% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,100RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 289ci | 638ci | ▲ 65C+349 ci · +121% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.8in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 5011 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 5011 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 232in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 128in | — |
| Wheelbase | 85in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 32,875lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 5011 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 5011 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | III/IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 5011 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 5011 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 5011 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 11gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 54th percentile (60 hp)B · 96th percentile (285 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (289 ci)B · 95th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 41st percentile (11)B · 39th percentile (10)
A · 5011B · 65CMedian Utility Tractor