BelarusModel A
Belarus 7010
Utility
- power
- 235 hp
- displacement
- 907 ci
- Cylinders
- 8
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 7010 vs CaseIH Puma 230
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 230
Row Crop
- power
- 231 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BelarusBelarus 7010
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 230
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 7010 higher · +4 hp (+2%)7010235 hp
Puma 230231 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
7010 is in the 95th percentile; Puma 230 is in the 95th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7010 higher · +496 ci (+121%)7010907 ci
Puma 230411 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
7010 is in the 98th percentile; Puma 230 is in the 91st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 7010 higher · +2 (+33%)70108
Puma 2306
Median Utility Tractor4
7010 is in the 99th percentile; Puma 230 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
7010 (A)Puma 230 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 7010 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 7010 | Puma 230 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 7010 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kirovets | FPT | — |
| Model | YaMZ | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 235hp | 231hp | ▲ 7010+4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Puma 230+500 RPM · +29% |
| Cylinders | 8 | 6 | ▲ 7010+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 907ci | 411ci | ▲ 7010+496 ci · +121% |
| Bore | 5.1in | 4.1in | ▲ 7010+1 in · +24% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.2in | ▲ 7010+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 7010 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | partially synchronized | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 7010 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 291in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 19,800lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 7010 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | articulated power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 7010 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type: 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 7010 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | articulated power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 7010 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 7010 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 17.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 7010 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 95th percentile (235 hp)B · 95th percentile (231 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 98th percentile (907 ci)B · 91st percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 99th percentile (8)B · 93rd percentile (6)
A · 7010B · Puma 230Median Utility Tractor