Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 825 vs Challenger MT525B MFWD
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT525B MFWD
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BelarusBelarus 825
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT525B MFWD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT525B MFWD higher · +113 ci (+39%)825290 ci
MT525B MFWD403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
825 is in the 83rd percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT525B MFWD higher · +2 (+50%)8254
MT525B MFWD6
Median Utility Tractor4
825 is in the 50th percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT525B MFWD higher · +2,446 lb (+27%)8259,100 lb
MT525B MFWD11,546 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
825 is in the 82nd percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 89th · 5,107 models
3-Point Hitch Capacity
▲ MT525B MFWD higher · +6,550 lb (+150%)8254,365 lb
MT525B MFWD10,915 lb
Median Utility Tractor3,197 lb
825 is in the 69th percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 90th · 1,083 models
825 (A)MT525B MFWD (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 825 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Challenger | — |
| Model | 825 | MT525B MFWD | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 825 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Model | D242 | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 81hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT525B MFWD+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 290ci | 403ci | ▲ MT525B MFWD+113 ci · +39% |
| Bore | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.9in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 825 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Auto Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 825 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 182in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 81.6in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 113in | — |
| Operating Weight | 9,100lb | 11,546lb | ▲ MT525B MFWD+2,446 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 825 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Belarus 825 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 825 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | 3 Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 4,365lb | 10,915lb | ▲ MT525B MFWD+6,550 lb · +150% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 825 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 825 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 825 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | 6.8gal | ▲ MT525B MFWD+1.5 gal · +28% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 825 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab (standard) | ROPS/FOPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (290 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 82nd percentile (9,100 lb)B · 89th percentile (11,546 lb)
3-Point Hitch Capacity
median 3,197 lbA · 69th percentile (4,365 lb)B · 90th percentile (10,915 lb)
A · 825B · MT525B MFWDMedian Utility Tractor