
BelarusModel A
Belarus MTZ-220
Agricultural
- power
- 220 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural

Agricultural
Agricultural
How they compare
MTZ-220 is in the 84th percentile; Puma 225 is in the 84th · 1,028 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-220 | CaseIH Puma 225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CaseIH | — |
| Model | MTZ-220 | Puma 225 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-220 | CaseIH Puma 225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CDC | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 24-valve | — |
| Power Output | 220hp | 225hp | ▲ Puma 225+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 6 | — |
| Displacement | Not recorded | 411ci | — |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.2in | — |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-220 | CaseIH Puma 225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | — |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-220 | CaseIH Puma 225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | Not recorded | 123in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 16,500lb | — |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-220 | CaseIH Puma 225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-220 | CaseIH Puma 225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-220 | CaseIH Puma 225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-220 | CaseIH Puma 225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-220 | CaseIH Puma 225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context