Image not recorded
Big BudModel A
Big Bud 450/50
Utility
- power
- 450 hp
- displacement
- 1,150 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Utility
Utility

Agricultural
How they compare
450/50 is in the 99th percentile; Steiger 435 is in the 99th · 5,383 models
450/50 is in the 99th percentile; Steiger 435 is in the 96th · 5,580 models
450/50 is in the 93rd percentile; Steiger 435 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
450/50 is in the 35th percentile; Steiger 435 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Big Bud 450/50 | CaseIH Steiger 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Big Bud | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 450/50 | Steiger 435 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
| Spec | Big Bud 450/50 | CaseIH Steiger 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Iveco | — |
| Power Output | 450hp | 435hp | ▲ 450/50+15 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 450/50+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 1,150ci | 786ci | ▲ 450/50+364 ci · +46% |
| Bore | 6.3in | 5.3in | ▲ 450/50+1 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 6.3in | 5.9in | ▲ 450/50+0.4 in · +7% |
| Spec | Big Bud 450/50 | CaseIH Steiger 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power Shift | Full Power Shift | — |
| Spec | Big Bud 450/50 | CaseIH Steiger 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 44in | — |
| Operating Weight | 41,500lb | 41,605lb | ▲ Steiger 435+105 lb · <1% |
| Spec | Big Bud 450/50 | CaseIH Steiger 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Parallel Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
| Spec | Big Bud 450/50 | CaseIH Steiger 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
| Spec | Big Bud 450/50 | CaseIH Steiger 435 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Category context