Image not recorded
Big BudModel A
Big Bud 600/50
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 600 hp
- displacement
- 1,150 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Big Bud 600/50 vs Challenger MT875C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT875C
Articulated
- power
- 586 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Big BudBig Bud 600/50
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT875C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 600/50 higher · +14 hp (+2%)600/50600 hp
MT875C586 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
600/50 is in the 92nd percentile; MT875C is in the 89th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 600/50 higher · +45 ci (+4%)600/501,150 ci
MT875C1,105 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
600/50 is in the 96th percentile; MT875C is in the 91st · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied600/506
MT875C6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
600/50 is in the 50th percentile; MT875C is in the 50th · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT875C higher · +7 (+78%)600/509
MT875C16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
600/50 is in the 4th percentile; MT875C is in the 50th · 146 models
600/50 (A)MT875C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Big Bud 600/50 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Big Bud | Challenger | — |
| Model | 600/50 | MT875C | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | Big Bud 600/50 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | KTA1150 | C18 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 600hp | 586hp | ▲ 600/50+14 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,100RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 1,150ci | 1,105ci | ▲ 600/50+45 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 6.3in | 5.7in | ▲ 600/50+0.6 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 6.3in | 7.2in | ▲ MT875C+0.9 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Big Bud 600/50 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | power shift | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Big Bud 600/50 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 270in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 142in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 138in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 56,000lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Big Bud 600/50 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Big Bud 600/50 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Big Bud 600/50 | Challenger MT875C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 92nd percentile (600 hp)B · 89th percentile (586 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 96th percentile (1,150 ci)B · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 4th percentile (9)B · 50th percentile (16)
A · 600/50B · MT875CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor