BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs CaseIH Farmall 25A
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 25A
Utility
- power
- 24.6 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 25A
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 25A higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)CT102524.5 hp
Farmall 25A24.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; Farmall 25A is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 25A higher · +11.3 ci (+16%)CT102569.1 ci
Farmall 25A80.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; Farmall 25A is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
Farmall 25A3
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 25A is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Farmall 25A higher · +981 lb (+66%)CT10251,488 lb
Farmall 25A2,469 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; Farmall 25A is in the 16th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)Farmall 25A (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | CaseIH | — |
| Model | CT1025 | Farmall 25A | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 24.6hp | ▲ Farmall 25A+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ CT1025+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 80.4ci | ▲ Farmall 25A+11.3 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ Farmall 25A+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.6in | ▲ Farmall 25A+0.4 in · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | sync shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 117in | ▲ Farmall 25A+17.7 in · +18% |
| Width | 46in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 87.6in | 88.2in | ▲ Farmall 25A+0.6 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 2,469lb | ▲ Farmall 25A+981 lb · +66% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540 (1.375) | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | CaseIH Farmall 25A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 16th percentile (2,469 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 24th percentile (117 in)
A · CT1025B · Farmall 25AMedian Utility Tractor