Head to head · Utility

Bobcat CT1025 vs Cub Cadet GT 3200

Bobcat CT1025 Tractor
BobcatModel A

Bobcat CT1025

Utility

power
24.5 hp
displacement
69.1 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full CT1025 specs
Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel B

Cub Cadet GT 3200

Lawn and Garden

power
25 hp
displacement
44.2 ci
Cylinders
2
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full GT 3200 specs
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet GT 3200

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Power

▲ GT 3200 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)
CT102524.5 hp
GT 320025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; GT 3200 is in the 16th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ CT1025 higher · +24.9 ci (+56%)
CT102569.1 ci
GT 320044.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; GT 3200 is in the 2nd · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ CT1025 higher · +1 (+50%)
CT10253
GT 32002
Median Utility Tractor4

CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; GT 3200 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ CT1025 higher · +683 lb (+85%)
CT10251,488 lb
GT 3200805 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; GT 3200 is in the 1st · 5,107 models

CT1025 (A)GT 3200 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecBobcat CT1025Cub Cadet GT 3200Difference
ManufacturerBobcatCub Cadet—
ModelCT1025GT 3200—
CategoryUtility, Sub-CompactLawn and Garden—

Engine

SpecBobcat CT1025Cub Cadet GT 3200Difference
ManufacturerDaedongKohler—
ModelShibaura S733LCommand CH730S—
Power Output24.5hp25hp▲ GT 3200+0.5 hp · +2%
Rated RPM3,000RPM3,600RPM▲ GT 3200+600 RPM · +20%
Cylinders32▲ CT1025+1 · +50%
Displacement69.1ci44.2ci▲ CT1025+24.9 ci · +56%
Bore3in3.3in▲ GT 3200+0.3 in · +10%
Stroke3.2in2.6in▲ CT1025+0.6 in · +23%

Transmission

SpecBobcat CT1025Cub Cadet GT 3200Difference
TypeHydrostaticHydrostaticSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecBobcat CT1025Cub Cadet GT 3200Difference
Length99.3in72in▲ CT1025+27.3 in · +38%
Width46in41.7in▲ CT1025+4.3 in · +10%
Height87.6in43.3in▲ CT1025+44.3 in · +102%
Operating Weight1,488lb805lb▲ CT1025+683 lb · +85%

Hydraulics

SpecBobcat CT1025Cub Cadet GT 3200Difference
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic Power—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecBobcat CT1025Cub Cadet GT 3200Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent with electric clutch—

Tires

SpecBobcat CT1025Cub Cadet GT 3200Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded16x7.5—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded24x10.5—

Hitch & Towing

SpecBobcat CT1025Cub Cadet GT 3200Difference
Hitch TypeRear Type: INot recorded—
Hitch CategoryNot recorded0—

Chassis & Drive

SpecBobcat CT1025Cub Cadet GT 3200Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x2 2WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded2WD—
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic Power—
Brake TypeNot recordedMechanical Disc—

Electrical

SpecBobcat CT1025Cub Cadet GT 3200Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecBobcat CT1025Cub Cadet GT 3200Difference
TypeNot recordedOpen—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 2nd percentile (44.2 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 1st percentile (805 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 1st percentile (72 in)
A · CT1025B · GT 3200Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageBobcat CT1025Full spec pageCub Cadet GT 3200