BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Massey Ferguson GC1715
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson GC1715
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson GC1715
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GC1715 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
GC171525 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; GC1715 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT1025 higher · +0.6 ci (<1%)CT102569.1 ci
GC171568.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; GC1715 is in the 8th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
GC17153
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; GC1715 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT1025 higher · +55 lb (+4%)CT10251,488 lb
GC17151,433 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; GC1715 is in the 5th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)GC1715 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | CT1025 | GC1715 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility, Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Iseki | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25hp | ▲ GC1715+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 3,000RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 68.5ci | ▲ CT1025+0.6 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ GC1715+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.1in | ▲ CT1025+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 97.2in | ▲ CT1025+2.1 in · +2% |
| Width | 46in | 47.2in | ▲ GC1715+1.2 in · +3% |
| Height | 87.6in | 72.4in | ▲ CT1025+15.2 in · +21% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 1,433lb | ▲ CT1025+55 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 2,000rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,190lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 5th percentile (1,433 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 7th percentile (97.2 in)
A · CT1025B · GC1715Median Utility Tractor