BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Bobcat CT1025 vs Mitsubishi MT250
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT250
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 78.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ MT250 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
MT25025 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
CT1025 is in the 42nd percentile; MT250 is in the 46th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT250 higher · +9.6 ci (+14%)CT102569.1 ci
MT25078.7 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
CT1025 is in the 33rd percentile; MT250 is in the 38th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
MT2503
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
CT1025 is in the 50th percentile; MT250 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT250 higher · +452 lb (+30%)CT10251,488 lb
MT2501,940 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
CT1025 is in the 22nd percentile; MT250 is in the 35th · 711 models
CT1025 (A)MT250 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CT1025 | MT250 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | K3H | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25hp | ▲ MT250+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ CT1025+300 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 78.7ci | ▲ MT250+9.6 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ MT250+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.5in | ▲ MT250+0.3 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 103in | ▲ MT250+3.7 in · +4% |
| Width | 46in | 46.9in | ▲ MT250+0.9 in · +2% |
| Height | 87.6in | 54.3in | ▲ CT1025+33.3 in · +61% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 1,940lb | ▲ MT250+452 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.00-15 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 11.2/10-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 42nd percentile (24.5 hp)B · 46th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 33rd percentile (69.1 ci)B · 38th percentile (78.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 22nd percentile (1,488 lb)B · 35th percentile (1,940 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 29th percentile (99.3 in)B · 34th percentile (103 in)
A · CT1025B · MT250Median Sub-Compact Tractor