BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Yanmar YM2500
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar YM2500
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 78 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
YanmarYanmar YM2500
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ YM2500 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
YM250025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; YM2500 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ YM2500 higher · +8.9 ci (+13%)CT102569.1 ci
YM250078 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; YM2500 is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT10253
YM25003
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; YM2500 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ YM2500 higher · +822 lb (+55%)CT10251,488 lb
YM25002,310 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; YM2500 is in the 15th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)YM2500 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Yanmar | — |
| Model | CT1025 | YM2500 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | 3T80-D | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25hp | ▲ YM2500+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 78ci | ▲ YM2500+8.9 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.2in | ▲ YM2500+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.4in | ▲ YM2500+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 46in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 87.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 2,310lb | ▲ YM2500+822 lb · +55% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 11th percentile (78 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,310 lb)
A · CT1025B · YM2500Median Utility Tractor