
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1000 vs Yanmar YM2500

Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar YM2500
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 78 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
FordFord 1000
vs
YanmarYanmar YM2500
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied100025 hp
YM250025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1000 is in the 16th percentile; YM2500 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ YM2500 higher · +0.4 ci (<1%)100077.6 ci
YM250078 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1000 is in the 11th percentile; YM2500 is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ YM2500 higher · +1 (+50%)10002
YM25003
Median Utility Tractor4
1000 is in the 3rd percentile; YM2500 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1000 higher · +1 (+13%)10009
YM25008
Median Utility Tractor12
1000 is in the 35th percentile; YM2500 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
1000 (A)YM2500 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 1000 | YM2500 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Yanmar | — |
| Model | LE892 | 3T80-D | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ YM2500+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 77.6ci | 78ci | ▲ YM2500+0.4 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.2in | ▲ 1000+0.4 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.4in | ▲ 1000+0.5 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 101in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 54.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,300lb | 2,310lb | ▲ YM2500+10 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Yanmar YM2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open, Optional two-post ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.6 ci)B · 11th percentile (78 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 14th percentile (2,300 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,310 lb)
A · 1000B · YM2500Median Utility Tractor