Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT225
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 85.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT225 vs New Holland Boomer 1025
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland Boomer 1025
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 69 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BobcatBobcat CT225
vs
New HollandNew Holland Boomer 1025
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT225 higher · +1 hp (+4%)CT22527 hp
Boomer 102526 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT225 is in the 19th percentile; Boomer 1025 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT225 higher · +16.4 ci (+24%)CT22585.4 ci
Boomer 102569 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT225 is in the 15th percentile; Boomer 1025 is in the 10th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT2253
Boomer 10253
Median Utility Tractor4
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; Boomer 1025 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT225 higher · +1,566 lb (+108%)CT2253,021 lb
Boomer 10251,455 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT225 is in the 23rd percentile; Boomer 1025 is in the 5th · 5,107 models
CT225 (A)Boomer 1025 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | New Holland | — |
| Model | CT225 | Boomer 1025 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S773L | — |
| Power Output | 27hp | 26hp | ▲ CT225+1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 3,000RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 85.4ci | 69ci | ▲ CT225+16.4 ci · +24% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 96.6in | ▲ CT225+21.4 in · +22% |
| Width | 55.5in | 46.4in | ▲ CT225+9.1 in · +20% |
| Height | 95.7in | 72.4in | ▲ CT225+23.3 in · +32% |
| Operating Weight | 3,021lb | 1,455lb | ▲ CT225+1,566 lb · +108% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live (Rear) and Optional (Middle) | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,225lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT225 | New Holland Boomer 1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27 hp)B · 18th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (85.4 ci)B · 10th percentile (69 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,021 lb)B · 5th percentile (1,455 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 7th percentile (96.6 in)
A · CT225B · Boomer 1025Median Utility Tractor