Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT230
Utility
- power
- 30 hp
- displacement
- 91.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT230 vs Ford 1900
BobcatBobcat CT230
vs
FordFord 1900
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT23030 hp
190030 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT230 is in the 22nd percentile; 1900 is in the 22nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT230 higher · +4.3 ci (+5%)CT23091.5 ci
190087.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT230 is in the 20th percentile; 1900 is in the 15th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT2303
19003
Median Utility Tractor4
CT230 is in the 23rd percentile; 1900 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT230 higher · +367 lb (+14%)CT2303,056 lb
19002,689 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT230 is in the 23rd percentile; 1900 is in the 19th · 5,107 models
CT230 (A)1900 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Ford 1900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Ford | — |
| Model | CT230 | 1900 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Ford 1900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | LEM853 | — |
| Power Output | 30hp | 30hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,800RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.5ci | 87.2ci | ▲ CT230+4.3 ci · +5% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Ford 1900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Ford 1900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 119in | ▲ 1900+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 55.9in | 57.7in | ▲ 1900+1.8 in · +3% |
| Height | 95.9in | 86.3in | ▲ CT230+9.6 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 3,056lb | 2,689lb | ▲ CT230+367 lb · +14% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Ford 1900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Ford 1900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live Rear PTO | Rear, transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Ford 1900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Ford 1900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | MFWD 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential mechanical drum | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Ford 1900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Ford 1900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT230 | Ford 1900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 22nd percentile (30 hp)B · 22nd percentile (30 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 20th percentile (91.5 ci)B · 15th percentile (87.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,056 lb)B · 19th percentile (2,689 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 25th percentile (119 in)
A · CT230B · 1900Median Utility Tractor