Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT2540
Utility
- power
- 39.6 hp
- displacement
- 111 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT2540 vs CaseIH Farmall 35B
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 35B
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 107 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
BobcatBobcat CT2540
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 35B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT2540 higher · +1.6 hp (+4%)CT254039.6 hp
Farmall 35B38 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT2540 is in the 33rd percentile; Farmall 35B is in the 31st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT2540 higher · +4 ci (+4%)CT2540111 ci
Farmall 35B107 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT2540 is in the 26th percentile; Farmall 35B is in the 25th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Farmall 35B higher · +1 (+33%)CT25403
Farmall 35B4
Median Utility Tractor4
CT2540 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 35B is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT2540 higher · +197 lb (+6%)CT25403,397 lb
Farmall 35B3,200 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT2540 is in the 28th percentile; Farmall 35B is in the 25th · 5,107 models
CT2540 (A)Farmall 35B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT2540 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | CaseIH | — |
| Model | CT2540 | Farmall 35B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT2540 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 3F-TM | S4L2 | — |
| Power Output | 39.6hp | 38hp | ▲ CT2540+1.6 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ Farmall 35B+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ Farmall 35B+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 111ci | 107ci | ▲ CT2540+4 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT2540 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | 12-speed partially synchronized and hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT2540 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 119in | — |
| Height | 91.7in | 91in | ▲ CT2540+0.7 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 3,397lb | 3,200lb | ▲ CT2540+197 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT2540 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT2540 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT2540 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT2540 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
| Pre-heating System | Not recorded | Glow plugs | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT2540 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 33rd percentile (39.6 hp)B · 31st percentile (38 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 26th percentile (111 ci)B · 25th percentile (107 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 28th percentile (3,397 lb)B · 25th percentile (3,200 lb)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 45th percentile (91.7 in)B · 42nd percentile (91 in)
A · CT2540B · Farmall 35BMedian Utility Tractor