BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT335
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 110 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT335 vs CaseIH Farmall 35B
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 35B
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 107 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
BobcatBobcat CT335
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 35B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT33538 hp
Farmall 35B38 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT335 is in the 31st percentile; Farmall 35B is in the 31st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT335 higher · +3 ci (+3%)CT335110 ci
Farmall 35B107 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT335 is in the 26th percentile; Farmall 35B is in the 25th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Farmall 35B higher · +1 (+33%)CT3353
Farmall 35B4
Median Utility Tractor4
CT335 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 35B is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT335 higher · +468 lb (+15%)CT3353,668 lb
Farmall 35B3,200 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT335 is in the 32nd percentile; Farmall 35B is in the 25th · 5,107 models
CT335 (A)Farmall 35B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | CaseIH | — |
| Model | CT335 | Farmall 35B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 3B183 | S4L2 | — |
| Power Output | 38hp | 38hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ Farmall 35B+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ Farmall 35B+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 110ci | 107ci | ▲ CT335+3 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic / Shuttle | 12-speed partially synchronized and hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 129in | 119in | ▲ CT335+10 in · +8% |
| Width | 62.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 63.4in | 91in | ▲ Farmall 35B+27.6 in · +44% |
| Operating Weight | 3,668lb | 3,200lb | ▲ CT335+468 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,700lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
| Pre-heating System | Not recorded | Glow plugs | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT335 | CaseIH Farmall 35B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 31st percentile (38 hp)B · 31st percentile (38 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 26th percentile (110 ci)B · 25th percentile (107 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,668 lb)B · 25th percentile (3,200 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 39th percentile (129 in)B · 26th percentile (119 in)
A · CT335B · Farmall 35BMedian Utility Tractor