Image not recorded
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT4058
Utility
- power
- 57.7 hp
- displacement
- 111 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT4058 vs McCormick Intl C60L
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl C60L
Utility
- power
- 57.6 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
BobcatBobcat CT4058
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl C60L
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT4058 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)CT405857.7 hp
C60L57.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT4058 is in the 52nd percentile; C60L is in the 51st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ C60L higher · +90 ci (+81%)CT4058111 ci
C60L201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT4058 is in the 26th percentile; C60L is in the 54th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT40583
C60L3
Median Utility Tractor4
CT4058 is in the 23rd percentile; C60L is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ C60L higher · +1,667 lb (+47%)CT40583,523 lb
C60L5,190 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT4058 is in the 30th percentile; C60L is in the 49th · 5,107 models
CT4058 (A)C60L (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | CT4058 | C60L | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Perkins | — |
| Model | Daedong 3FT | 1103C-33 | — |
| Power Output | 57.7hp | 57.6hp | ▲ CT4058+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ CT4058+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 111ci | 201ci | ▲ C60L+90 ci · +81% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 4.1in | ▲ C60L+0.7 in · +21% |
| Stroke | 4in | 5in | ▲ C60L+1 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 126in | 153in | ▲ C60L+27 in · +21% |
| Width | 63in | 67in | ▲ C60L+4 in · +6% |
| Height | 96.8in | 94.9in | ▲ CT4058+1.9 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 3,523lb | 5,190lb | ▲ C60L+1,667 lb · +47% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT4058 | McCormick Intl C60L | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 52nd percentile (57.7 hp)B · 51st percentile (57.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 26th percentile (111 ci)B · 54th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 30th percentile (3,523 lb)B · 49th percentile (5,190 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 35th percentile (126 in)B · 68th percentile (153 in)
A · CT4058B · C60LMedian Utility Tractor