
Head to head · Utility
Bolens G152 vs Yanmar AF-160


YanmarModel B
Yanmar AF-160
Utility
- power
- 15.8 hp
- displacement
- 59.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
BolensBolens G152
vs
YanmarYanmar AF-160
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ AF-160 higher · +0.8 hp (+5%)G15215 hp
AF-16015.8 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
G152 is in the 3rd percentile; AF-160 is in the 3rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ AF-160 higher · +18.3 ci (+45%)G15240.8 ci
AF-16059.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
G152 is in the 1st percentile; AF-160 is in the 5th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ AF-160 higher · +1 (+50%)G1522
AF-1603
Median Utility Tractor4
G152 is in the 3rd percentile; AF-160 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ AF-160 higher · +2 (+33%)G1526
AF-1608
Median Utility Tractor12
G152 is in the 11th percentile; AF-160 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
G152 (A)AF-160 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bolens G152 | Yanmar AF-160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bolens | Yanmar | — |
| Model | G152 | AF-160 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Bolens G152 | Yanmar AF-160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Yanmar | — |
| Model | KE 70 | 3TNE72 | — |
| Power Output | 15hp | 15.8hp | ▲ AF-160+0.8 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ AF-160+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 40.8ci | 59.1ci | ▲ AF-160+18.3 ci · +45% |
| Bore | 2.9in | 2.8in | ▲ G152+0.1 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.1in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Bolens G152 | Yanmar AF-160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized Gear | Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bolens G152 | Yanmar AF-160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 76.4in | 103in | ▲ AF-160+26.6 in · +35% |
| Width | 37.8in | 43.3in | ▲ AF-160+5.5 in · +15% |
| Height | 46.9in | 73.6in | ▲ AF-160+26.7 in · +57% |
| Operating Weight | 1,034lb | 1,587lb | ▲ AF-160+553 lb · +53% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bolens G152 | Yanmar AF-160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bolens G152 | Yanmar AF-160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bolens G152 | Yanmar AF-160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Bolens G152 | Yanmar AF-160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bolens G152 | Yanmar AF-160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 3rd percentile (15 hp)B · 3rd percentile (15.8 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 1st percentile (40.8 ci)B · 5th percentile (59.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 1st percentile (1,034 lb)B · 7th percentile (1,587 lb)
A · G152B · AF-160Median Utility Tractor