Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 2120
Sub-Compact
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 183 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Sub-Compact
CaseIH 2120 vs CaseIH 254
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH 254
Sub-Compact
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 64.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
CaseIHCaseIH 2120
vs
CaseIHCaseIH 254
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Displacement
▲ 2120 higher · +118 ci (+183%)2120183 ci
25464.7 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
2120 is in the 93rd percentile; 254 is in the 26th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied21203
2543
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
2120 is in the 50th percentile; 254 is in the 50th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ 254 higher · +1 (+13%)21208
2549
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
2120 is in the 40th percentile; 254 is in the 50th · 616 models
Operating Weight
▲ 2120 higher · +2,151 lb (+110%)21204,101 lb
2541,950 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
2120 is in the 81st percentile; 254 is in the 35th · 711 models
2120 (A)254 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 2120 | 254 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Carraro | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | SLH 100.3.A | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,350RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 183ci | 64.7ci | ▲ 2120+118 ci · +183% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 132in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 47.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 52.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,101lb | 1,950lb | ▲ 2120+2,151 lb · +110% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 93rd percentile (183 ci)B · 26th percentile (64.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 40th percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 81st percentile (4,101 lb)B · 35th percentile (1,950 lb)
A · 2120B · 254Median Sub-Compact Tractor