CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 2150
Sub-Compact
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Sub-Compact
CaseIH 2150 vs CaseIH 254
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH 254
Sub-Compact
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 64.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
CaseIHCaseIH 2150
vs
CaseIHCaseIH 254
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Displacement
▲ 2150 higher · +179 ci (+277%)2150244 ci
25464.7 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
2150 is in the 98th percentile; 254 is in the 26th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 2150 higher · +1 (+33%)21504
2543
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
2150 is in the 90th percentile; 254 is in the 50th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ 254 higher · +1 (+13%)21508
2549
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
2150 is in the 40th percentile; 254 is in the 50th · 616 models
Operating Weight
▲ 2150 higher · +2,768 lb (+142%)21504,718 lb
2541,950 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
2150 is in the 90th percentile; 254 is in the 35th · 711 models
2150 (A)254 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 2150 | 254 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Carraro | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | SLH 1000.4.A | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,350RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 2150+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 64.7ci | ▲ 2150+179 ci · +277% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 137in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 47.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 51.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,718lb | 1,950lb | ▲ 2150+2,768 lb · +142% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I/II | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | CaseIH 254 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 98th percentile (244 ci)B · 26th percentile (64.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 90th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 40th percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 90th percentile (4,718 lb)B · 35th percentile (1,950 lb)
A · 2150B · 254Median Sub-Compact Tractor