Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 235
Utility
- power
- 18 hp
- displacement
- 51.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Utility

Utility
How they compare
235 is in the 6th percentile; AF-180 is in the 6th · 5,383 models
235 is in the 3rd percentile; AF-180 is in the 7th · 5,580 models
235 is in the 23rd percentile; AF-180 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
235 is in the 4th percentile; AF-180 is in the 8th · 5,107 models
Full comparison
| Spec | CaseIH 235 | Yanmar AF-180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 235 | AF-180 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
| Spec | CaseIH 235 | Yanmar AF-180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3TNE74 | — |
| Power Output | 18hp | 17.8hp | ▲ 235+0.2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 235+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 51.8ci | 61.4ci | ▲ AF-180+9.6 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 2.7in | 2.9in | ▲ AF-180+0.2 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 3.1in | Same |
| Spec | CaseIH 235 | Yanmar AF-180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Shuttle | — |
| Spec | CaseIH 235 | Yanmar AF-180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 103in | 103in | Same |
| Width | 37in | 43.3in | ▲ AF-180+6.3 in · +17% |
| Height | Not recorded | 75.6in | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,350lb | 1,653lb | ▲ AF-180+303 lb · +22% |
| Spec | CaseIH 235 | Yanmar AF-180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | CaseIH 235 | Yanmar AF-180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Spec | CaseIH 235 | Yanmar AF-180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
| Spec | CaseIH 235 | Yanmar AF-180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context