CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 254
Sub-Compact
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 64.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
CaseIH 254 vs Steyr 80
SteyrModel B
Steyr 80
Sub-Compact
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 4
CaseIHCaseIH 254
vs
SteyrSteyr 80
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Displacement
▲ 80 higher · +16.5 ci (+26%)25464.7 ci
8081.2 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
254 is in the 26th percentile; 80 is in the 42nd · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 254 higher · +2 (+200%)2543
801
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
254 is in the 50th percentile; 80 is in the 2nd · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ 254 higher · +5 (+125%)2549
804
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
254 is in the 50th percentile; 80 is in the 2nd · 616 models
Operating Weight
▲ 80 higher · +696 lb (+36%)2541,950 lb
802,646 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
254 is in the 35th percentile; 80 is in the 49th · 711 models
254 (A)80 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 254 | Steyr 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Steyr | — |
| Model | 254 | 80 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 254 | Steyr 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Steyr | — |
| Model | Not recorded | WD 113 | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 1 | ▲ 254+2 · +200% |
| Displacement | 64.7ci | 81.2ci | ▲ 80+16.5 ci · +26% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 254 | Steyr 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 254 | Steyr 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 113in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 57.9in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 66.1in | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,950lb | 2,646lb | ▲ 80+696 lb · +36% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 254 | Steyr 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 254 | Steyr 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 254 | Steyr 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 26th percentile (64.7 ci)B · 42nd percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 2nd percentile (1)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 50th percentile (9)B · 2nd percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 35th percentile (1,950 lb)B · 49th percentile (2,646 lb)
A · 254B · 80Median Sub-Compact Tractor