Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 255 vs CaseIH Farmall DX24E
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall DX24E
Utility
- power
- 24 hp
- displacement
- 61.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 255
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX24E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied25524 hp
Farmall DX24E24 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
255 is in the 14th percentile; Farmall DX24E is in the 14th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 255 higher · +3.5 ci (+6%)25564.8 ci
Farmall DX24E61.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
255 is in the 8th percentile; Farmall DX24E is in the 7th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2553
Farmall DX24E3
Median Utility Tractor4
255 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall DX24E is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 255 higher · +617 lb (+47%)2551,940 lb
Farmall DX24E1,323 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
255 is in the 11th percentile; Farmall DX24E is in the 3rd · 5,107 models
255 (A)Farmall DX24E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 255 | Farmall DX24E | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Shibaura | — |
| Power Output | 24hp | 24hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ Farmall DX24E+300 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 64.8ci | 61.3ci | ▲ 255+3.5 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant mesh | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 47in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 54.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,940lb | 1,323lb | ▲ 255+617 lb · +47% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5-24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 14th percentile (24 hp)B · 14th percentile (24 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 8th percentile (64.8 ci)B · 7th percentile (61.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 11th percentile (1,940 lb)B · 3rd percentile (1,323 lb)
A · 255B · Farmall DX24EMedian Utility Tractor