Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 255 vs VST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224
Image not recorded
VSTModel B
VST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224
Utility
- power
- 22 hp
- displacement
- 59.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
CaseIHCaseIH 255
vs
VSTVST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 255 higher · +2 hp (+9%)25524 hp
Mitsubishi Shakti VT22422 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
255 is in the 14th percentile; Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 is in the 11th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 255 higher · +5 ci (+8%)25564.8 ci
Mitsubishi Shakti VT22459.8 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
255 is in the 8th percentile; Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 is in the 5th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2553
Mitsubishi Shakti VT2243
Median Utility Tractor4
255 is in the 23rd percentile; Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 255 higher · +3 (+50%)2559
Mitsubishi Shakti VT2246
Median Utility Tractor12
255 is in the 35th percentile; Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
255 (A)Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | VST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | VST | — |
| Model | 255 | Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | VST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | V3D | — |
| Power Output | 24hp | 22hp | ▲ 255+2 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ Mitsubishi Shakti VT224+300 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 64.8ci | 59.8ci | ▲ 255+5 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 3in | 2.9in | ▲ 255+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 3.1in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | VST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant mesh | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | VST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 100in | ▲ 255+12 in · +12% |
| Width | 47in | 42.7in | ▲ 255+4.3 in · +10% |
| Height | 54.9in | 49.2in | ▲ 255+5.7 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 1,940lb | 1,631lb | ▲ 255+309 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | VST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | VST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5-24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | VST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | VST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | VST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | VST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | VST Mitsubishi Shakti VT224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 14th percentile (24 hp)B · 11th percentile (22 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 8th percentile (64.8 ci)B · 5th percentile (59.8 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 11th percentile (1,940 lb)B · 8th percentile (1,631 lb)
A · 255B · Mitsubishi Shakti VT224Median Utility Tractor