Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall DX29
Utility
- power
- 29 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall DX29 vs Shibaura SE3000
Image not recorded
ShibauraModel B
Shibaura SE3000
Utility
- power
- 30 hp
- displacement
- 87.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX29
vs
ShibauraShibaura SE3000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ SE3000 higher · +1 hp (+3%)Farmall DX2929 hp
SE300030 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall DX29 is in the 21st percentile; SE3000 is in the 22nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ SE3000 higher · +6 ci (+7%)Farmall DX2981.2 ci
SE300087.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall DX29 is in the 13th percentile; SE3000 is in the 15th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall DX293
SE30003
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall DX29 is in the 23rd percentile; SE3000 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ SE3000 higher · +94 lb (+4%)Farmall DX292,474 lb
SE30002,568 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Farmall DX29 is in the 16th percentile; SE3000 is in the 17th · 5,107 models
Farmall DX29 (A)SE3000 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Shibaura SE3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Farmall DX29 | SE3000 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Shibaura SE3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Shibaura | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | LEM853 | — |
| Power Output | 29hp | 30hp | ▲ SE3000+1 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,800RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 81.2ci | 87.2ci | ▲ SE3000+6 ci · +7% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Shibaura SE3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Shibaura SE3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 119in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 62.2in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 59.8in | — |
| Wheelbase | 63in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,474lb | 2,568lb | ▲ SE3000+94 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Shibaura SE3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Shibaura SE3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Shibaura SE3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Shibaura SE3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 21st percentile (29 hp)B · 22nd percentile (30 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)B · 15th percentile (87.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 16th percentile (2,474 lb)B · 17th percentile (2,568 lb)
A · Farmall DX29B · SE3000Median Utility Tractor