Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 275 vs CaseIH Farmall 30C
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 30C
Utility
- power
- 32.2 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH 275
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 30C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 30C higher · +1.2 hp (+4%)27531 hp
Farmall 30C32.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
275 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 30C is in the 25th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied27591.3 ci
Farmall 30C91.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
275 is in the 17th percentile; Farmall 30C is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2753
Farmall 30C3
Median Utility Tractor4
275 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 30C is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 30C higher · +3 (+33%)2759
Farmall 30C12
Median Utility Tractor12
275 is in the 35th percentile; Farmall 30C is in the 50th · 4,941 models
275 (A)Farmall 30C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 275 | Farmall 30C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | N843T-F-24 | — |
| Power Output | 31hp | 32.2hp | ▲ Farmall 30C+1.2 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 275+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.3ci | 91.3ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Synchronized Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 119in | ▲ Farmall 30C+7 in · +6% |
| Width | 54in | 66.4in | ▲ Farmall 30C+12.4 in · +23% |
| Height | Not recorded | 93.6in | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,600lb | 3,218lb | ▲ Farmall 30C+618 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Rear Type I | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric Starter | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall 30C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 23rd percentile (31 hp)B · 25th percentile (32.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 18th percentile (2,600 lb)B · 26th percentile (3,218 lb)
A · 275B · Farmall 30CMedian Utility Tractor