
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 395 vs CaseIH Farmall 50C

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 50C
Utility
- power
- 45.6 hp
- displacement
- 135 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH 395
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 50C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 395 higher · +0.4 hp (<1%)39546 hp
Farmall 50C45.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
395 is in the 40th percentile; Farmall 50C is in the 40th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 395 higher · +20 ci (+15%)395155 ci
Farmall 50C135 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
395 is in the 42nd percentile; Farmall 50C is in the 33rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Farmall 50C higher · +1 (+33%)3953
Farmall 50C4
Median Utility Tractor4
395 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 50C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 50C higher · +8 (+100%)3958
Farmall 50C16
Median Utility Tractor12
395 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 50C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
395 (A)Farmall 50C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 395 | CaseIH Farmall 50C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 395 | Farmall 50C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 395 | CaseIH Farmall 50C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Case International | Shibaura | — |
| Model | D-155 | N844L-F-34 | — |
| Power Output | 46hp | 45.6hp | ▲ 395+0.4 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ Farmall 50C+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ Farmall 50C+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 155ci | 135ci | ▲ 395+20 ci · +15% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.3in | ▲ 395+0.6 in · +18% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 3.9in | ▲ 395+0.5 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 395 | CaseIH Farmall 50C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially Synchronized | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 395 | CaseIH Farmall 50C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 136in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 98.3in | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,869lb | 3,869lb | ▲ 395+1,000 lb · +26% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 395 | CaseIH Farmall 50C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 395 | CaseIH Farmall 50C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I/II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 5,500lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 395 | CaseIH Farmall 50C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 395 | CaseIH Farmall 50C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH 395 | CaseIH Farmall 50C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Not recorded | Diesel particulate filter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 395 | CaseIH Farmall 50C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 395 | CaseIH Farmall 50C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open (with ROPS) | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 40th percentile (46 hp)B · 40th percentile (45.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 42nd percentile (155 ci)B · 33rd percentile (135 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 46th percentile (4,869 lb)B · 35th percentile (3,869 lb)
A · 395B · Farmall 50CMedian Utility Tractor