Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 495 vs CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT
Utility
- power
- 54 hp
- displacement
- 136 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 495
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 55C CVT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 55C CVT higher · +1 hp (+2%)49553 hp
Farmall 55C CVT54 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
495 is in the 48th percentile; Farmall 55C CVT is in the 49th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 495 higher · +43 ci (+32%)495179 ci
Farmall 55C CVT136 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
495 is in the 48th percentile; Farmall 55C CVT is in the 35th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied4953
Farmall 55C CVT3
Median Utility Tractor4
495 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 55C CVT is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 495 higher · +1,010 lb (+24%)4955,200 lb
Farmall 55C CVT4,190 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
495 is in the 49th percentile; Farmall 55C CVT is in the 39th · 5,107 models
495 (A)Farmall 55C CVT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 495 | Farmall 55C CVT | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | FPT | — |
| Model | D-179 | R7531E4 | — |
| Power Output | 53hp | 54hp | ▲ Farmall 55C CVT+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ Farmall 55C CVT+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 179ci | 136ci | ▲ 495+43 ci · +32% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.7in | ▲ 495+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 495+0.9 in · +21% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially Synchronized | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 122in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 68.3in | — |
| Height | 93.5in | 97.4in | ▲ Farmall 55C CVT+3.9 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 5,200lb | 4,190lb | ▲ 495+1,010 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier IV | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | exhaust-gas recirculation with diesel particulate filter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 48th percentile (53 hp)B · 49th percentile (54 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 48th percentile (179 ci)B · 35th percentile (136 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 49th percentile (5,200 lb)B · 39th percentile (4,190 lb)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 49th percentile (93.5 in)B · 59th percentile (97.4 in)
A · 495B · Farmall 55C CVTMedian Utility Tractor