Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH 8920 vs CaseIH Puma 150

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH 8920

Row Crop

power
155 hp
displacement
505 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full 8920 specs
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B

CaseIH Puma 150

Row Crop

power
150 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 150 specs
CaseIHCaseIH 8920
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 150

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 279–1,417

Engine Power

▲ 8920 higher · +5 hp (+3%)
8920155 hp
Puma 150150 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

8920 is in the 60th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 57th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8920 higher · +94 ci (+23%)
8920505 ci
Puma 150411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

8920 is in the 87th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 60th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
89206
Puma 1506
Median Row Crop Tractor6

8920 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
892018
Puma 15018
Median Row Crop Tractor16

8920 is in the 61st percentile; Puma 150 is in the 61st · 1,200 models

8920 (A)Puma 150 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH 8920CaseIH Puma 150Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHCaseIHSame
Model8920Puma 150—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH 8920CaseIH Puma 150Difference
ManufacturerCDCFPT—
ModelNot recordedTurbocharged with Air-to-Air Aftercooling Diesel—
Power Output155hp150hp▲ 8920+5 hp · +3%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement505ci411ci▲ 8920+94 ci · +23%
Bore4.5in4.1in▲ 8920+0.4 in · +10%
Stroke5.3in5.2in▲ 8920+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH 8920CaseIH Puma 150Difference
TypeFull power shiftFull power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH 8920CaseIH Puma 150Difference
HeightNot recorded118in—
Operating Weight17,418lb13,900lb▲ 8920+3,518 lb · +25%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH 8920CaseIH Puma 150Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedClosed Center Pressure Flow Compensating—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH 8920CaseIH Puma 150Difference
TypeIndependent / Dual-shaftNot recorded—
Speed 1540rpmNot recorded—
Speed 21,000rpmNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH 8920CaseIH Puma 150Difference
Hitch TypeIII/IIINRear Type II—
Hitch CategoryElectronic lower-link draft sensingCategory 2—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity10,000lb24,251lb▲ Puma 150+14,251 lb · +143%

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH 8920CaseIH Puma 150Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive Type2WDMFWD 4WD—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame
Brake TypeDifferential hydraulic wet discNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH 8920CaseIH Puma 150Difference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V—
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH 8920CaseIH Puma 150Difference
Coolant7galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH 8920CaseIH Puma 150Difference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 60th percentile (155 hp)B · 57th percentile (150 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 75th percentile (17,418 lb)B · 62nd percentile (13,900 lb)
A · 8920B · Puma 150Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH 8920Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 150