CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 8950
Row Crop
- power
- 225 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH 8950 vs Steiger Bearcat
SteigerModel B
Steiger Bearcat
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 225 hp
- displacement
- 636 ci
- Cylinders
- 8
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH 8950
vs
SteigerSteiger Bearcat
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tied8950225 hp
Bearcat225 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
8950 is in the 83rd percentile; Bearcat is in the 83rd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Bearcat higher · +131 ci (+26%)8950505 ci
Bearcat636 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
8950 is in the 87th percentile; Bearcat is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ Bearcat higher · +2 (+33%)89506
Bearcat8
Median Row Crop Tractor6
8950 is in the 50th percentile; Bearcat is in the 99th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8950 higher · +8 (+80%)895018
Bearcat10
Median Row Crop Tractor16
8950 is in the 61st percentile; Bearcat is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
8950 (A)Bearcat (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | Steiger Bearcat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Steiger | — |
| Model | 8950 | Bearcat | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | Steiger Bearcat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3160 | — |
| Power Output | 225hp | 225hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 8 | ▲ Bearcat+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 505ci | 636ci | ▲ Bearcat+131 ci · +26% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.5in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ 8950+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | Steiger Bearcat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift, Hydraulic Wet Disc Clutch | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | Steiger Bearcat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 18,340lb | 19,600lb | ▲ Bearcat+1,260 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | Steiger Bearcat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | Steiger Bearcat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with Electro-Hydraulic Wet Disc Clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | Steiger Bearcat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 16,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | Steiger Bearcat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | MFWD 4WD | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | Steiger Bearcat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | Steiger Bearcat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 7.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | Steiger Bearcat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab with air-conditioning | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 83rd percentile (225 hp)B · 83rd percentile (225 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 98th percentile (636 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (8)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 79th percentile (18,340 lb)B · 83rd percentile (19,600 lb)
A · 8950B · BearcatMedian Row Crop Tractor