Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9150
Utility
- power
- 280 hp
- displacement
- 611 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9150 vs Challenger 65C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH 9150
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +5 hp (+2%)9150280 hp
65C285 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9150 is in the 96th percentile; 65C is in the 96th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +27 ci (+4%)9150611 ci
65C638 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9150 is in the 95th percentile; 65C is in the 95th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied91506
65C6
Median Utility Tractor4
9150 is in the 93rd percentile; 65C is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9150 higher · +2 (+20%)915012
65C10
Median Utility Tractor12
9150 is in the 50th percentile; 65C is in the 39th · 4,941 models
9150 (A)65C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 9150 | 65C | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | LTA-10 | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 280hp | 285hp | ▲ 65C+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 611ci | 638ci | ▲ 65C+27 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 5in | 4.8in | ▲ 9150+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 5.4in | 6in | ▲ 65C+0.7 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 273in | 232in | ▲ 9150+41 in · +18% |
| Width | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Height | 143in | 128in | ▲ 9150+15 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 23,000lb | 32,875lb | ▲ 65C+9,875 lb · +43% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Closed center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | III/IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | 11gal | ▲ 9150+4 gal · +36% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 96th percentile (280 hp)B · 96th percentile (285 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 95th percentile (611 ci)B · 95th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 95th percentile (23,000 lb)B · 98th percentile (32,875 lb)
A · 9150B · 65CMedian Utility Tractor