Head to head · Utility

CaseIH 9150 vs Challenger MT675C

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH 9150

Utility

power
280 hp
displacement
611 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
12
Full 9150 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT675C

Agricultural

power
281 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT675C specs
CaseIHCaseIH 9150
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT675C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 4,321–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT675C higher · +1 hp (<1%)
9150280 hp
MT675C281 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

9150 is in the 96th percentile; MT675C is in the 96th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 9150 higher · +98 ci (+19%)
9150611 ci
MT675C513 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

9150 is in the 95th percentile; MT675C is in the 94th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
91506
MT675C6
Median Utility Tractor4

9150 is in the 93rd percentile; MT675C is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT675C higher · +2,795 lb (+12%)
915023,000 lb
MT675C25,795 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

9150 is in the 95th percentile; MT675C is in the 96th · 5,107 models

9150 (A)MT675C (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH 9150Challenger MT675CDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
Model9150MT675C—
CategoryUtilityAgricultural—

Engine

SpecCaseIH 9150Challenger MT675CDifference
ManufacturerCumminsAGCO SISU POWER—
ModelLTA-1084CTA—
Power Output280hp281hp▲ MT675C+1 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,200RPM▲ MT675C+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement611ci513ci▲ 9150+98 ci · +19%
Bore5in4.4in▲ 9150+0.6 in · +14%
Stroke5.4in5.7in▲ MT675C+0.4 in · +8%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH 9150Challenger MT675CDifference
TypeFull power shiftTechstar CVT, continuously variable transmission—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH 9150Challenger MT675CDifference
Length273in223in▲ 9150+50 in · +22%
Height143in133in▲ 9150+10 in · +8%
Operating Weight23,000lb25,795lb▲ MT675C+2,795 lb · +12%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH 9150Challenger MT675CDifference
System TypeClosed CenterClosed center load sensing—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerNot recorded—

Tires

SpecCaseIH 9150Challenger MT675CDifference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded420/90R30—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded480/80R46—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH 9150Challenger MT675CDifference
Hitch CategoryIIIIIISame
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH 9150Challenger MT675CDifference
Chassis Type4x4 articulated 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH 9150Challenger MT675CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH 9150Challenger MT675CDifference
Coolant15galNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 96th percentile (280 hp)B · 96th percentile (281 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 95th percentile (611 ci)B · 94th percentile (513 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 95th percentile (23,000 lb)B · 96th percentile (25,795 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 98th percentile (273 in)B · 95th percentile (223 in)
A · 9150B · MT675CMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH 9150Full spec pageChallenger MT675C