Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT675C
Agricultural
- power
- 281 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT675C vs Fendt 936
FendtModel B
Fendt 936
Agricultural
- power
- 315 hp
- displacement
- 551 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT675C
vs
FendtFendt 936
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 936 higher · +34 hp (+12%)MT675C281 hp
936315 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT675C is in the 92nd percentile; 936 is in the 94th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 936 higher · +38 ci (+7%)MT675C513 ci
936551 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT675C is in the 88th percentile; 936 is in the 91st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT675C6
9366
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT675C is in the 74th percentile; 936 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 936 higher · +2,580 lb (+10%)MT675C25,795 lb
93628,375 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT675C is in the 93rd percentile; 936 is in the 94th · 971 models
MT675C (A)936 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT675C | 936 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO SISU POWER | MAN Diesel | — |
| Model | 84CTA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 281hp | 315hp | ▲ 936+34 hp · +12% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ MT675C+500 RPM · +29% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 551ci | ▲ 936+38 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ 936+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Techstar CVT, continuously variable transmission | CVT (stepless Vario with a combination of mechanical and hydrostatic sections) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 223in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 109in | — |
| Height | 133in | 131in | ▲ MT675C+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 25,795lb | 28,375lb | ▲ 936+2,580 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 420/90R30 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 480/80R46 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 4.7 KW Electric Starter | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 92nd percentile (281 hp)B · 94th percentile (315 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 91st percentile (551 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (25,795 lb)B · 94th percentile (28,375 lb)
Height
median 111 inA · 92nd percentile (133 in)B · 91st percentile (131 in)
A · MT675CB · 936Median Agricultural Tractor