Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9150
Utility
- power
- 280 hp
- displacement
- 611 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9150 vs Massey Ferguson 8S.265
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 8S.265
Row Crop
- power
- 262 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 28
CaseIHCaseIH 9150
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 8S.265
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9150 higher · +18 hp (+7%)9150280 hp
8S.265262 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9150 is in the 96th percentile; 8S.265 is in the 96th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9150 higher · +162 ci (+36%)9150611 ci
8S.265449 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9150 is in the 95th percentile; 8S.265 is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied91506
8S.2656
Median Utility Tractor4
9150 is in the 93rd percentile; 8S.265 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8S.265 higher · +16 (+133%)915012
8S.26528
Median Utility Tractor12
9150 is in the 50th percentile; 8S.265 is in the 95th · 4,941 models
9150 (A)8S.265 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Massey Ferguson 8S.265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 9150 | 8S.265 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Massey Ferguson 8S.265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | LTA-10 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 280hp | 262hp | ▲ 9150+18 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,850RPM | ▲ 9150+250 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 611ci | 449ci | ▲ 9150+162 ci · +36% |
| Bore | 5in | 4.3in | ▲ 9150+0.7 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 5.4in | 5.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Massey Ferguson 8S.265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Dyna-7 | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Massey Ferguson 8S.265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 273in | 212in | ▲ 9150+61 in · +29% |
| Height | 143in | 134in | ▲ 9150+9 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 23,000lb | 19,180lb | ▲ 9150+3,820 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Massey Ferguson 8S.265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Closed center load-sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Massey Ferguson 8S.265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Massey Ferguson 8S.265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 540/65R30 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 650/65R42 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Massey Ferguson 8S.265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Massey Ferguson 8S.265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Massey Ferguson 8S.265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Massey Ferguson 8S.265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 96th percentile (280 hp)B · 96th percentile (262 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 95th percentile (611 ci)B · 93rd percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 95th percentile (28)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 95th percentile (23,000 lb)B · 95th percentile (19,180 lb)
A · 9150B · 8S.265Median Utility Tractor