Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9150
Utility
- power
- 280 hp
- displacement
- 611 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9150 vs Steyr 8320
SteyrModel B
Steyr 8320
Agricultural
- power
- 280 hp
- displacement
- 594 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 9150
vs
SteyrSteyr 8320
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied9150280 hp
8320280 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9150 is in the 96th percentile; 8320 is in the 96th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9150 higher · +17 ci (+3%)9150611 ci
8320594 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9150 is in the 95th percentile; 8320 is in the 95th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied91506
83206
Median Utility Tractor4
9150 is in the 93rd percentile; 8320 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 9150 higher · +11,644 lb (+103%)915023,000 lb
832011,356 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
9150 is in the 95th percentile; 8320 is in the 89th · 5,107 models
9150 (A)8320 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Steyr | — |
| Model | 9150 | 8320 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Steyr | — |
| Model | LTA-10 | WD 615.85 | — |
| Power Output | 280hp | 280hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 8320+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 611ci | 594ci | ▲ 9150+17 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 5in | 5in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.4in | 5.1in | ▲ 9150+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 273in | 180in | ▲ 9150+93 in · +52% |
| Height | 143in | 128in | ▲ 9150+15 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 23,000lb | 11,356lb | ▲ 9150+11,644 lb · +103% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 96th percentile (280 hp)B · 96th percentile (280 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 95th percentile (611 ci)B · 95th percentile (594 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 95th percentile (23,000 lb)B · 89th percentile (11,356 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 98th percentile (273 in)B · 90th percentile (180 in)
A · 9150B · 8320Median Utility Tractor