Image not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Ford 976 vs Steyr 8320
SteyrModel B
Steyr 8320
Agricultural
- power
- 280 hp
- displacement
- 594 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 976
vs
SteyrSteyr 8320
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 976 higher · +80 hp (+29%)976360 hp
8320280 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
976 is in the 96th percentile; 8320 is in the 92nd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 976 higher · +261 ci (+44%)976855 ci
8320594 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
976 is in the 97th percentile; 8320 is in the 92nd · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied9766
83206
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
976 is in the 74th percentile; 8320 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 976 higher · +9,744 lb (+86%)97621,100 lb
832011,356 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
976 is in the 87th percentile; 8320 is in the 52nd · 971 models
976 (A)8320 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 976 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Steyr | — |
| Model | 976 | 8320 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 976 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Steyr | — |
| Model | NTA-855-A360 | WD 615.85 | — |
| Power Output | 360hp | 280hp | ▲ 976+80 hp · +29% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 8320+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 855ci | 594ci | ▲ 976+261 ci · +44% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 5in | ▲ 976+0.5 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.1in | ▲ 976+0.9 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 976 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 976 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 260in | 180in | ▲ 976+80 in · +44% |
| Height | 125in | 128in | ▲ 8320+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 21,100lb | 11,356lb | ▲ 976+9,744 lb · +86% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 976 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 976 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN/III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 976 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 976 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 976 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 976 | Steyr 8320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 96th percentile (360 hp)B · 92nd percentile (280 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 97th percentile (855 ci)B · 92nd percentile (594 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 87th percentile (21,100 lb)B · 52nd percentile (11,356 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 97th percentile (260 in)B · 57th percentile (180 in)
A · 976B · 8320Median Agricultural Tractor