Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9170
Utility
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9170 vs Challenger MT675E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT675E
Agricultural
- power
- 320 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 9170
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT675E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9170 higher · +15 hp (+5%)9170335 hp
MT675E320 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9170 is in the 97th percentile; MT675E is in the 97th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9170 higher · +342 ci (+67%)9170855 ci
MT675E513 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9170 is in the 98th percentile; MT675E is in the 94th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied91706
MT675E6
Median Utility Tractor4
9170 is in the 93rd percentile; MT675E is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Length
▲ 9170 higher · +61 in (+28%)9170280 in
MT675E219 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
9170 is in the 98th percentile; MT675E is in the 95th · 4,659 models
9170 (A)MT675E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT675E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 9170 | MT675E | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT675E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO POWER | — |
| Model | NTA-855 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 320hp | ▲ 9170+15 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 855ci | 513ci | ▲ 9170+342 ci · +67% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.4in | ▲ 9170+1.1 in · +25% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.7in | ▲ 9170+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT675E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | CVT with two mechanical ranges | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT675E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 280in | 219in | ▲ 9170+61 in · +28% |
| Width | 164in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 141in | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 122in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 24,670lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT675E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT675E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT675E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT675E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (12 volts) | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT675E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier IV | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT675E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT675E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (335 hp)B · 97th percentile (320 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 98th percentile (855 ci)B · 94th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Length
median 137 inA · 98th percentile (280 in)B · 95th percentile (219 in)
A · 9170B · MT675EMedian Utility Tractor