Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9230
Utility
- power
- 235 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9230 vs Challenger MT575E
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT575E
Agricultural
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 9230
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT575E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT575E higher · +5 hp (+2%)9230235 hp
MT575E240 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9230 is in the 95th percentile; MT575E is in the 96th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9230 higher · +56 ci (+12%)9230505 ci
MT575E449 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9230 is in the 94th percentile; MT575E is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied92306
MT575E6
Median Utility Tractor4
9230 is in the 93rd percentile; MT575E is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
9230 (A)MT575E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9230 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 9230 | MT575E | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9230 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 235hp | 240hp | ▲ MT575E+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 9230+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 449ci | ▲ 9230+56 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ 9230+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9230 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9230 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 242in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 130in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 24,106lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9230 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing, pressure compensating | Closed-center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power with articulation and front-axle steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9230 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9230 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power with articulation and front-axle steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9230 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9230 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 7.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 95th percentile (235 hp)B · 96th percentile (240 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 94th percentile (505 ci)B · 93rd percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
A · 9230B · MT575EMedian Utility Tractor