Head to head · Utility

CaseIH 9230 vs Challenger MT735

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH 9230

Utility

power
235 hp
displacement
505 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
12
Full 9230 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT735

Articulated

power
235 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT735 specs
CaseIHCaseIH 9230
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT735

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 4,941–5,720

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
9230235 hp
MT735235 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

9230 is in the 95th percentile; MT735 is in the 95th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT735 higher · +32 ci (+6%)
9230505 ci
MT735537 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

9230 is in the 94th percentile; MT735 is in the 94th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
92306
MT7356
Median Utility Tractor4

9230 is in the 93rd percentile; MT735 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT735 higher · +4 (+33%)
923012
MT73516
Median Utility Tractor12

9230 is in the 50th percentile; MT735 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models

9230 (A)MT735 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH 9230Challenger MT735Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
Model9230MT735—
CategoryUtilityArticulated—

Engine

SpecCaseIH 9230Challenger MT735Difference
ManufacturerCDCCaterpillar—
Power Output235hp235hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,100RPM▲ 9230+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement505ci537ci▲ MT735+32 ci · +6%
Bore4.5in4.4in▲ 9230+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.3in5.9in▲ MT735+0.6 in · +11%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH 9230Challenger MT735Difference
TypeFull power shiftFull power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH 9230Challenger MT735Difference
Length242inNot recorded—
Width120inNot recorded—
Height130inNot recorded—
Operating Weight24,106lb28,185lb▲ MT735+4,079 lb · +17%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH 9230Challenger MT735Difference
System TypeClosed center load sensing, pressure compensatingNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic power with articulation and front-axle steeringElectro-hydraulic—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH 9230Challenger MT735Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryIIIIIISame
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH 9230Challenger MT735Difference
Chassis Type4x4 articulated 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic power with articulation and front-axle steeringElectro-hydraulic—
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discHydraulic wet discSame

Electrical

SpecCaseIH 9230Challenger MT735Difference
Battery Voltage12VNot recorded—
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH 9230Challenger MT735Difference
Coolant7.4galNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 95th percentile (235 hp)B · 95th percentile (235 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 94th percentile (505 ci)B · 94th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 96th percentile (24,106 lb)B · 97th percentile (28,185 lb)
A · 9230B · MT735Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH 9230Full spec pageChallenger MT735