Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9270
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
CaseIH 9270 vs Claas Xerion 3300
ClaasModel B
Claas Xerion 3300
Utility
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 9270
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 3300
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
= Effectively tied9270335 hp
Xerion 3300335 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
9270 is in the 38th percentile; Xerion 3300 is in the 38th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9270 higher · +318 ci (+59%)9270855 ci
Xerion 3300537 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
9270 is in the 61st percentile; Xerion 3300 is in the 13th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied92706
Xerion 33006
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
9270 is in the 50th percentile; Xerion 3300 is in the 50th · 159 models
Operating Weight
▲ 9270 higher · +5,385 lb (+19%)927034,045 lb
Xerion 330028,660 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
9270 is in the 41st percentile; Xerion 3300 is in the 26th · 132 models
9270 (A)Xerion 3300 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Claas | — |
| Model | 9270 | Xerion 3300 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | NTA-855 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 335hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 855ci | 537ci | ▲ 9270+318 ci · +59% |
| Bore | 5.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift; fully synchronized | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 280in | 261in | ▲ 9270+19 in · +7% |
| Width | 96in | 98in | ▲ Xerion 3300+2 in · +2% |
| Height | 150in | 147in | ▲ 9270+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 34,045lb | 28,660lb | ▲ 9270+5,385 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing pressure compensating | Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Four-wheel steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | III | III N | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Four-wheel steering | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 38th percentile (335 hp)B · 38th percentile (335 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 61st percentile (855 ci)B · 13th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 41st percentile (34,045 lb)B · 26th percentile (28,660 lb)
Length
median 275 inA · 53rd percentile (280 in)B · 34th percentile (261 in)
A · 9270B · Xerion 3300Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor