Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9270
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
CaseIH 9270 vs Fendt 1149 MT
FendtModel B
Fendt 1149 MT
Crawler
- power
- 451 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH 9270
vs
FendtFendt 1149 MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 1149 MT higher · +116 hp (+35%)9270335 hp
1149 MT451 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
9270 is in the 38th percentile; 1149 MT is in the 66th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1149 MT higher · +170 ci (+20%)9270855 ci
1149 MT1,025 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
9270 is in the 61st percentile; 1149 MT is in the 87th · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ 1149 MT higher · +6 (+100%)92706
1149 MT12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
9270 is in the 50th percentile; 1149 MT is in the 99th · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1149 MT higher · +4 (+33%)927012
1149 MT16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
9270 is in the 27th percentile; 1149 MT is in the 50th · 146 models
9270 (A)1149 MT (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Fendt 1149 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fendt | — |
| Model | 9270 | 1149 MT | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Fendt 1149 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | NTA-855 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 451hp | ▲ 1149 MT+116 hp · +35% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 12 | ▲ 1149 MT+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 855ci | 1,025ci | ▲ 1149 MT+170 ci · +20% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.4in | ▲ 9270+1.1 in · +25% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.7in | ▲ 9270+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Fendt 1149 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift; fully synchronized | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Fendt 1149 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 280in | 266in | ▲ 9270+14 in · +5% |
| Width | 96in | 118in | ▲ 1149 MT+22 in · +23% |
| Height | 150in | 136in | ▲ 9270+14 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 34,045lb | 42,692lb | ▲ 1149 MT+8,647 lb · +25% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Fendt 1149 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing pressure compensating | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Fendt 1149 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category IV/III | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Fendt 1149 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Fendt 1149 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Fendt 1149 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Fendt 1149 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 38th percentile (335 hp)B · 66th percentile (451 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 61st percentile (855 ci)B · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 27th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 41st percentile (34,045 lb)B · 66th percentile (42,692 lb)
A · 9270B · 1149 MTMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor