FendtModel A
Fendt 1149 MT
Crawler
- power
- 451 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Crawler
Fendt 1149 MT vs Rome 375C
Image not recorded
RomeModel B
Rome 375C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 375 hp
- displacement
- 890 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
FendtFendt 1149 MT
vs
RomeRome 375C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 1149 MT higher · +76 hp (+20%)1149 MT451 hp
375C375 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
1149 MT is in the 82nd percentile; 375C is in the 74th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1149 MT higher · +135 ci (+15%)1149 MT1,025 ci
375C890 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
1149 MT is in the 96th percentile; 375C is in the 88th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 1149 MT higher · +6 (+100%)1149 MT12
375C6
Median Crawler Tractor6
1149 MT is in the 99th percentile; 375C is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1149 MT higher · +4 (+33%)1149 MT16
375C12
Median Crawler Tractor10
1149 MT is in the 69th percentile; 375C is in the 54th · 179 models
1149 MT (A)375C (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fendt 1149 MT | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | Rome | — |
| Model | 1149 MT | 375C | — |
| Category | Crawler | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Fendt 1149 MT | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3406 | — |
| Power Output | 451hp | 375hp | ▲ 1149 MT+76 hp · +20% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 12 | 6 | ▲ 1149 MT+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 1,025ci | 890ci | ▲ 1149 MT+135 ci · +15% |
| Bore | 4.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Fendt 1149 MT | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fendt 1149 MT | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 266in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 118in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 136in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 42,692lb | 33,000lb | ▲ 1149 MT+9,692 lb · +29% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fendt 1149 MT | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fendt 1149 MT | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category IV/III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fendt 1149 MT | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Track | 4WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Fendt 1149 MT | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Fendt 1149 MT | Rome 375C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 82nd percentile (451 hp)B · 74th percentile (375 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 96th percentile (1,025 ci)B · 88th percentile (890 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 99th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 69th percentile (16)B · 54th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 83rd percentile (42,692 lb)B · 68th percentile (33,000 lb)
A · 1149 MTB · 375CMedian Crawler Tractor