Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9350
Row Crop
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 660 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH 9350 vs Claas Challenger 65E
ClaasModel B
Claas Challenger 65E
Agricultural
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH 9350
vs
ClaasClaas Challenger 65E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tied9350310 hp
Challenger 65E310 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
9350 is in the 94th percentile; Challenger 65E is in the 94th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9350 higher · +31 ci (+5%)9350660 ci
Challenger 65E629 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
9350 is in the 99th percentile; Challenger 65E is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied93506
Challenger 65E6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
9350 is in the 50th percentile; Challenger 65E is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9350 higher · +14 (+140%)935024
Challenger 65E10
Median Row Crop Tractor16
9350 is in the 81st percentile; Challenger 65E is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
9350 (A)Challenger 65E (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Claas | — |
| Model | 9350 | Challenger 65E | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | M11-A310 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 310hp | 310hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 660ci | 629ci | ▲ 9350+31 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.8in | 5.5in | ▲ 9350+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | SynchroShift | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 264in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 94in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 143in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 28,720lb | 34,195lb | ▲ Challenger 65E+5,475 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | III, IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | Crawler | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Crawler Drive | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
| Brake Type | hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | 15gal | ▲ 9350+1.5 gal · +10% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 94th percentile (310 hp)B · 94th percentile (310 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 99th percentile (660 ci)B · 98th percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 81st percentile (24)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 97th percentile (28,720 lb)B · 99th percentile (34,195 lb)
A · 9350B · Challenger 65EMedian Row Crop Tractor