ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75C
Articulated
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger 75C vs Claas Challenger 65E
ClaasModel B
Claas Challenger 65E
Agricultural
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
ChallengerChallenger 75C
vs
ClaasClaas Challenger 65E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ 75C higher · +15 hp (+5%)75C325 hp
Challenger 65E310 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
75C is in the 13th percentile; Challenger 65E is in the 9th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied75C629 ci
Challenger 65E629 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
75C is in the 13th percentile; Challenger 65E is in the 13th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied75C6
Challenger 65E6
Median Articulated Tractor6
75C is in the 50th percentile; Challenger 65E is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied75C10
Challenger 65E10
Median Articulated Tractor16
75C is in the 3rd percentile; Challenger 65E is in the 3rd · 59 models
75C (A)Challenger 65E (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Claas | — |
| Model | 75C | Challenger 65E | — |
| Category | Articulated | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | 3176 ATAAC | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 325hp | 310hp | ▲ 75C+15 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 629ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 144in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 33,305lb | 34,195lb | ▲ Challenger 65E+890 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear 1000 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III, IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Crawler | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Crawler Drive | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | 15gal | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Claas Challenger 65E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 13th percentile (325 hp)B · 9th percentile (310 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 13th percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 3rd percentile (10)B · 3rd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 8th percentile (33,305 lb)B · 9th percentile (34,195 lb)
A · 75CB · Challenger 65EMedian Articulated Tractor