CaseIHModel A
CaseIH C42
Sub-Compact
- power
- 42 hp
- displacement
- 144 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Sub-Compact
CaseIH C42 vs LS Neo N41
Image not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH C42
vs
LSLS Neo N41
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ Neo N41 higher · +1 hp (+2%)C4242 hp
Neo N4143 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
C42 is in the 80th percentile; Neo N41 is in the 81st · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ C42 higher · +3 ci (+2%)C42144 ci
Neo N41141 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
C42 is in the 82nd percentile; Neo N41 is in the 80th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ Neo N41 higher · +1 (+33%)C423
Neo N414
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
C42 is in the 50th percentile; Neo N41 is in the 90th · 802 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedC4216
Neo N4116
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
C42 is in the 89th percentile; Neo N41 is in the 89th · 616 models
C42 (A)Neo N41 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH C42 | LS Neo N41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | LS | — |
| Model | C42 | Neo N41 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH C42 | LS Neo N41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Steyr | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | WD308 | S4QL | — |
| Power Output | 42hp | 43hp | ▲ Neo N41+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ Neo N41+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ Neo N41+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 144ci | 141ci | ▲ C42+3 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.5in | ▲ C42+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.7in | ▲ C42+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH C42 | LS Neo N41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro | Synchro shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH C42 | LS Neo N41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 139in | 126in | ▲ C42+13 in · +10% |
| Width | Not recorded | 49.5in | — |
| Height | 90.2in | 94.7in | ▲ Neo N41+4.5 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 5,204lb | 5,064lb | ▲ C42+140 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH C42 | LS Neo N41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH C42 | LS Neo N41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 12.4 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH C42 | LS Neo N41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH C42 | LS Neo N41 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 80th percentile (42 hp)B · 81st percentile (43 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 82nd percentile (144 ci)B · 80th percentile (141 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 90th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 89th percentile (16)B · 89th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 94th percentile (5,204 lb)B · 93rd percentile (5,064 lb)
A · C42B · Neo N41Median Sub-Compact Tractor