CaseIHModel A
CaseIH CS 110
Row Crop
- power
- 109 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH CS 110 vs CaseIH Farmall 100C
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 100C
Row Crop
- power
- 99 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH CS 110
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 100C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ CS 110 higher · +10 hp (+10%)CS 110109 hp
Farmall 100C99 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
CS 110 is in the 30th percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 24th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CS 110 higher · +62 ci (+30%)CS 110269 ci
Farmall 100C207 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
CS 110 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 10th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCS 1104
Farmall 100C4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
CS 110 is in the 17th percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ CS 110 higher · +12 (+100%)CS 11024
Farmall 100C12
Median Row Crop Tractor16
CS 110 is in the 81st percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 27th · 1,200 models
CS 110 (A)Farmall 100C (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH CS 110 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | CS 110 | Farmall 100C | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH CS 110 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | FPT | — |
| Model | 420.85 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 109hp | 99hp | ▲ CS 110+10 hp · +10% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 269ci | 207ci | ▲ CS 110+62 ci · +30% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ CS 110+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.3in | ▲ CS 110+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH CS 110 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Four-speed power shift | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH CS 110 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 163in | — |
| Width | 94.1in | 75.7in | ▲ CS 110+18.4 in · +24% |
| Height | 114in | 107in | ▲ CS 110+7 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 11,056lb | 6,989lb | ▲ CS 110+4,067 lb · +58% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH CS 110 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH CS 110 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH CS 110 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH CS 110 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH CS 110 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH CS 110 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | SCR and Cooled EGR | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH CS 110 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 30th percentile (109 hp)B · 24th percentile (99 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 23rd percentile (269 ci)B · 10th percentile (207 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 81st percentile (24)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 40th percentile (11,056 lb)B · 15th percentile (6,989 lb)
A · CS 110B · Farmall 100CMedian Row Crop Tractor