CaseIHModel A
CaseIH CVX 150
Utility
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH CVX 150 vs Challenger MT545D
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT545D
Utility
- power
- 152 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
CaseIHCaseIH CVX 150
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT545D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT545D higher · +2 hp (+1%)CVX 150150 hp
MT545D152 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CVX 150 is in the 93rd percentile; MT545D is in the 93rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CVX 150 higher · +1 ci (<1%)CVX 150403 ci
MT545D402 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CVX 150 is in the 90th percentile; MT545D is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCVX 1506
MT545D6
Median Utility Tractor4
CVX 150 is in the 93rd percentile; MT545D is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT545D higher · +724 lb (+5%)CVX 15014,046 lb
MT545D14,770 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CVX 150 is in the 92nd percentile; MT545D is in the 93rd · 5,107 models
CVX 150 (A)MT545D (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH CVX 150 | Challenger MT545D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | CVX 150 | MT545D | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH CVX 150 | Challenger MT545D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | Sisu AGCO Power | — |
| Model | 620.83 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 152hp | ▲ MT545D+2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ CVX 150+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 403ci | 402ci | ▲ CVX 150+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH CVX 150 | Challenger MT545D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH CVX 150 | Challenger MT545D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 189in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 113in | — |
| Operating Weight | 14,046lb | 14,770lb | ▲ MT545D+724 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH CVX 150 | Challenger MT545D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH CVX 150 | Challenger MT545D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 520/65R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 650/65R38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH CVX 150 | Challenger MT545D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH CVX 150 | Challenger MT545D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH CVX 150 | Challenger MT545D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH CVX 150 | Challenger MT545D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Interim Tier IV | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 93rd percentile (150 hp)B · 93rd percentile (152 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (403 ci)B · 90th percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 92nd percentile (14,046 lb)B · 93rd percentile (14,770 lb)
A · CVX 150B · MT545DMedian Utility Tractor