ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT545D
Utility
- power
- 152 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT545D vs Ursus 1674 Forte
UrsusModel B
Ursus 1674 Forte
Agricultural
- power
- 156 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT545D
vs
UrsusUrsus 1674 Forte
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1674 Forte higher · +4 hp (+3%)MT545D152 hp
1674 Forte156 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT545D is in the 93rd percentile; 1674 Forte is in the 93rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT545D402 ci
1674 Forte402 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT545D is in the 90th percentile; 1674 Forte is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT545D6
1674 Forte6
Median Utility Tractor4
MT545D is in the 93rd percentile; 1674 Forte is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT545D higher · +8 (+50%)MT545D24
1674 Forte16
Median Utility Tractor12
MT545D is in the 92nd percentile; 1674 Forte is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
MT545D (A)1674 Forte (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Ursus | — |
| Model | MT545D | 1674 Forte | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu AGCO Power | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1106D-E66TA | — |
| Power Output | 152hp | 156hp | ▲ 1674 Forte+4 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 402ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 181in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 90.6in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 124in | — |
| Wheelbase | 113in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 14,770lb | 14,374lb | ▲ MT545D+396 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 520/65R28 | 14.9R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 650/65R38 | 20.8R38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | III/II | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Interim Tier IV | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 93rd percentile (152 hp)B · 93rd percentile (156 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 90th percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 93rd percentile (14,770 lb)B · 93rd percentile (14,374 lb)
A · MT545DB · 1674 ForteMedian Utility Tractor